Notice · Franchising & Distribution

Notice of dispute under the Franchising Code, with ADR referral and Ombudsman request

Notice of dispute meeting s 72(1) of the Franchising Code (nature of the dispute, outcome wanted, proposed resolution), with a follow-up ADR referral and a request for the Ombudsman to appoint an ADR practitioner.

Kind
Notice. A formal notice to serve or publish.
Where it applies
Australia
AI use
Yellow AI can help in set ways. A lawyer checks specific points before use.
Law stated as at
17 October 2026
Status
Maintained. Checked against the cited sources on 17 October 2026.
Version
1
Source
Written for this library

When to use it

Use by a franchisee or franchisor to start the Code’s dispute process, or the agreement’s equivalent procedure. Do not use to start court proceedings; the Code does not stop a party going to court (s 68), but urgent relief needs separate advice.

How AI may be used

AI may structure the dispute summary and chronology from the file. The lawyer settles how the dispute is characterised, the outcome sought and any without prejudice content.

AI may

  • Draft a chronology and a neutral summary of the dispute from correspondence, with references
  • Check the notice covers each s 72(1) element
  • Calculate the 21-day and 14-day periods

AI must not

  • Must not decide the outcome to be sought or concessions to offer
  • Must not include without prejudice settlement proposals in an open notice
  • Must not process the other party’s confidential information in an unapproved tool

The lawyer checks

  • Dispute described accurately and within any time limits in the agreement
  • Outcome and proposed resolution realistic and consistent with the client’s instructions
  • Notice served as the agreement requires

Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.

Authorities

Read the full text

More in Franchising & Distribution

All precedents for Franchising & Distribution · Tasks and AI use in this area