Draft an anti-doping response under the Australian National Anti-Doping Policy
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From the notice and the National Anti-Doping Policy, confirm which National Sports Tribunal division hears the matter and the appeal path from it, then schedule the athlete’s election dates (the B-sample request window and the hearing election) and the response dates, naming the rule each one comes from. Set each World Anti-Doping Code or policy article asserted in the notice beside the material on the file that answers it, including the athlete’s therapeutic use exemption (TUE) and medication records, and list every allegation the file does not yet answer. The tool writes no part of the athlete response, the governing-body paper, any procedural submission or any statutory declaration annexed to them: no draft, no first draft, no scaffold, no suggested paragraphs. Against the response the lawyer has written, check each substance named against the 2026 Prohibited List taken from Sport Integrity Australia rather than any copy the tool holds, and flag every account of how the substance entered the body with nothing on the file behind it.
- What the lawyer must review
- Check the 2026 Prohibited List with Sport Integrity Australia (not ASADA)
- Check the current Anti-Doping Policy
- Check NST rules and the appeal path for each division
- Check any TUE and the October 2025 task force rules on manipulation
- Written for / version
- Commonwealth versionCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes organising research leads and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.