Draft a takedown or letter pack under the Criminal Code deepfake amendments
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Tabulate each captured item beside the Commonwealth basis the lawyer has named for it, and list what the eSafety Commissioner’s removal scheme requires, taking those requirements from its current published text rather than from what the tool recalls. The tool writes no part of the platform notice or the cease-and-desist letter: no draft, no first draft, no scaffold, no suggested paragraphs, and it names no right of its own. Against the notice and letter the lawyer has written, list every assertion with no source on the file, and check both against the current text of the Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act 2024 and the scheme’s reach.
- What the lawyer must review
- Confirm the status of the Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act 2024
- Confirm the status of the NSW Intimate Image and Audio Material Act 2025 and SA law
- Confirm the status of the My Face, My Rights Bill 2025
- Check the privacy tort (10 June 2025) and OAIC biometric rulings
- Do not rely on a personality right: none exists
- Written for / version
- Commonwealth versionCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
- Preserve original files and relevant metadata. Document provenance and handling, and seek forensic review where authenticity needs to be resolved.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.