Draft or review a heritage-impact statement against the listing and the Burra Charter
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Compare the proposal with the listing citation, conservation policy and Australian ICOMOS Burra Charter 2013 principles; list impacts, gaps and conditions.
- What the lawyer must review
- Confirm listing: NSW Heritage Register (Heritage Act 1977 (NSW)) or local heritage schedule
- Confirm listing: Victorian Heritage Register and Heritage Overlay (Heritage Act 2017 (Vic))
- Confirm listing: Queensland Heritage Register (Queensland Heritage Act 1992)
- Check for recent listings, delistings or interim protection orders
- Take significance and impact on fabric and setting from a qualified heritage consultant
- Check whether Aboriginal cultural heritage obligations also apply
- Written for / version
- Australia versionAU
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
- Confirm the appropriate instructions, permissions and cultural context with the relevant people before using information or communicating the result.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.