Draft or review a heritage-impact statement against the listing
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Compare the proposal with the listing citation and conservation policy, and list impacts, gaps and recommended conditions.
- What the lawyer must review
- Decide heritage significance and acceptable impact with the heritage expert
- Use the comparison only as an aid
- Written for / version
- AU
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Check the specialist’s assumptions, qualifications and limits. Obtain the relevant expert or specialist review before relying on a technical conclusion.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.