Screen the site under the state Aboriginal heritage Act and Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From title, maps and searches, list Aboriginal heritage and Native Title Act future-act flags and missing documents. Do not decide if a CHMP, AHIP or future act applies.
- What the lawyer must review
- Decide on a CHMP, AHIP or future-act procedure with an archaeologist or anthropologist
- Consult registered Aboriginal parties
- Remember breaching Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) future-act rules may invalidate the activity
- Check current registered claims, ILUAs and the state register
- Confirm with the state heritage council or native title body
- Written for / version
- Australia versionAU
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.