Test a NSW primary psychological injury against the main-contributing-factor test

MaintainedLast reviewed

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
From the diagnosis, the events and whether the worker is exempt, using a firm-controlled tool, table the main-contributing-factor test and the substantial-contributing-factor note for an exempt worker. Do not decide which test applies.
What the lawyer must review
  • Decide which contribution test the current instrument states for this worker.
  • Do not apply the main-contributing-factor test to an exempt worker without checking the disease page.
  • Reach the management-action exclusion only after the contribution test.
  • Health and wage records stay in a firm-controlled tool. Apply ASCR r 9, APP 11, and the notifiable-breach test.
Written for / version
New South Wales versionNSWVICQLD

Rules that apply

The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.

The work product

Forum. New South Wales workers compensation, primary psychological injury

Produce. A note of the contribution test that may apply, with the exempt-worker question marked.

Have ready. Diagnosis; Whether the worker is in an exempt class; Account of work and other causes.

Example of the limit. Illustrative example: A firefighter has a primary psychological injury. The note records the main-contributing-factor guidance and the disease page's different words for an exempt worker. The lawyer chooses the test. The tool does not.

Stop and hand it back when

  • The worker's exempt status is unknown.
  • The question is only about reasonable management action.

Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceFrom the diagnosis, the events and whether the worker is exempt, using a firm-controlled tool, table the main-contributing-factor test and the substantial-contributing-factor note for an exempt worker. Do not decide which test applies.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Record whether the worker is a police officer, paramedic, firefighter or another exempt class the pages name.
  2. Keep main and substantial as separate tests. Do not average them.
  3. Do not treat exemption as a presumption that the injury is work-related.
  4. Confirm the current sections 8O and 9A before quoting them.

Sources

If this is lodged with the Personal Injury Commission, Procedural Direction PIC13 keeps health records in a controlled environment and forbids a generative tool from writing a person's evidence.

The disease page's substantial-contributing-factor sentence is about a disease injury. The lawyer decides whether it is the test for this psychological injury.

If health or wage records leave the firm-controlled tool, decide whether a Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) breach is notifiable.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions