Sort clinical records produced to the court and flag third-party pages

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
From the produced records, build a page index that marks the date, the author and any page naming a person other than the client. The tool does not decide what may be inspected or copied.
What the lawyer must review
  • Keep clinical records in a firm-controlled tool. Do not put them in a public AI tool.
  • Conduct rule 9.1 bars disclosure of confidential client information, with the exceptions in rule 9.2.
  • Take reasonable steps under APP 11 to protect the records from loss or unauthorised access.
  • Decide whether a loss likely to result in serious harm must be notified under the Privacy Act.
Written for / version
NSWVICQLD

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: NSWVICQLD

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceFrom the produced records, build a page index that marks the date, the author and any page naming a person other than the client. The tool does not decide what may be inspected or copied.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Open the produced set and check the flag against the page, not against the index alone.
  2. Hold back pages that name another patient until the lawyer decides the claim of confidence.
  3. Record what was copied and what was returned to the court.
  4. Use a firm-controlled tool. A public tool is not used for these records.

Sources

These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions