Compare a further Victorian silica damages application to an earlier full and final award

MaintainedLast reviewed

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
Set out, from the WorkSafe page, who can make a further silica damages application, what a court may set aside, and that an earlier award is not reopened. Do not write the application.
What the lawyer must review
  • The lawyer decides whether a further application is open.
  • Keep this to silica-related disease, as the page states it.
  • Do not treat an award made before the Act as reopened.
  • A choice the client signs or receives is settled by the lawyer before it goes out.
Written for / version
Victoria versionVICNSWQLD

Rules that apply

The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.

The work product

Forum. WorkSafe Victoria, silica common-law changes, and the Dust Diseases List

Produce. A comparison of a further silica application and an earlier full and final award.

Have ready. Earlier award or its absence; Current and later silica diagnoses; Date the damages application would start.

Example of the limit. Illustrative example: An award was made before the 2022 Act, and a further silica disease is now diagnosed. The tool records the dates and the page's statement that the change is not retrospective. The lawyer decides whether any application is open. The tool does not write it.

Stop and hand it back when

  • The output reopens an earlier full and final award.
  • The disease is not silica-related and the page is still applied.

Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceDo not begin AI assistance until the responsible lawyer has defined and confirmed its permitted scope.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. The page says injured workers with silica-related diseases can make a further common law application if they develop a subsequent silica-related disease.
  2. Courts can set aside a future award where further related diseases might develop.
  3. The page says the change applies to a damages application commenced after the Act took effect, and that an earlier award was full and final.
  4. No Victorian provisional-damages section was opened. Section 51A and the 30 per cent lung-transplant impairment are statutory benefit changes on the same page, not this damages choice.

Sources

Do not copy the New South Wales provisional-damages section into this proceeding.

Practice Note SC GEN 25 was issued and commences on 14 May 2026. Do not enter confidential or sensitive information into a public AI tool. Evidence must be the person's own knowledge and words.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions