Reconcile restrictive practice use records with authorisations and monthly reports
Key facts
- Human involvement
- GreenLawyer review
- How AI is used
- From the implementing provider's use records, the authorisations and the monthly reports lodged with the Commission, match each use to an authorisation and a reported entry, and list uses with no authorisation or no report.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides whether any unmatched use was unauthorised, whether it must be reported as a reportable incident, and what the provider must correct.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the implementing provider's use records, the authorisations and the monthly reports lodged with the Commission, match each use to an authorisation and a reported entry, and list uses with no authorisation or no report. |
| Lawyer | The lawyer decides whether any unmatched use was unauthorised, whether it must be reported as a reportable incident, and what the provider must correct. |
Checklist
- Check each use against the authorisation for the same person, practice and period.
- Confirm the monthly reports were lodged in the portal that applies to the plan's lodgement date.
- Confirm the lawyer, not the tool, decides whether an exception is a reportable incident.
Sources
- NDIS Commission: Behaviour support and restrictive practices · 2026-10-18
- NDIS Commission: Reportable incidents · 2026-10-18
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.