Advise whether an online wagering service is lawful

Key facts

Human involvement: RedLawyer-led
How AI is used: Table the states where the service would be offered and the federal provisions the lawyer has named. State no conclusion on whether the service is lawful.
What the lawyer must review: The Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084, prohibits a person in the business of betting from knowingly using a wire communication facility to transmit bets or wagers on a sporting event in interstate or foreign commerce, with a stated exception for information sent between places where that betting is legal. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5363, prohibits a person in that business from knowingly accepting a financial instrument in connection with unlawful internet gambling. Murphy v. NCAA held that PASPA's ban on state authorization and licensing of sports-gambling schemes violates the anticommandeering doctrine and that the rest of PASPA could not be severed. It does not issue a federal license. The state where the bet is offered decides whether to license sports betting. The lawyer gives the advice.
Written for / version: United States versionUS

Who does what

Who does what
Role	What they do
Assistance	Supporting preparation only. Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human.
Lawyer	Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use.

Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.