Flag a standing order before an immigration-court brief
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Record whether the file contains a standing order on generative AI for that court, and quote the order's filing requirement if it is in the file. Write no brief and no disclosure paragraph.
- What the lawyer must review
- EOIR Policy Memorandum 25-40, 8 August 2025, says there is no blanket prohibition and no mandatory disclosure, and that an immigration judge or court may adopt a standing order regulating generative AI in pleadings. The forum is the immigration court or the Board of Immigration Appeals, not an Australian tribunal. A brief that will be filed is written by the lawyer. Section 1003.102(c) reaches a false statement of material fact or law made knowingly or with reckless disregard.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Do not begin AI assistance until the responsible lawyer has defined and confirmed its permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.