Build a probity file index from the panel papers
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the evaluation plan, conflict declarations and contact logs, list missing declarations, unlogged contacts and documents that should be on the probity file.
- What the lawyer must review
- Treat a missing conflict declaration as a process risk
- Do not treat a generated index as a clearance
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the evaluation plan, conflict declarations and contact logs, list missing declarations, unlogged contacts and documents that should be on the probity file. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
- The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probity plan for a government procurement | Policy | AI use Yellow | A probity plan for a Commonwealth procurement: principles, roles (including any probity adviser or auditor), conflicts, confidentiality and information security, communications with tenderers, handling late or non-conforming submissions, AI tool rules, breaches and records. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.
Sources
Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.