Separate South Australian procedure from interstate precedents
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Flag procedural steps in a draft that cite a court rule, and list the jurisdiction each citation claims to be from.
- What the lawyer must review
- Open the South Australian rule
- Do not accept a NSW or Victorian form number because the draft is confident
- Written for / version
- South Australia versionSA
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. South Australia
Produce. A list of procedural citations with the jurisdiction each one claims.
Have ready. The draft; The South Australian rules the lawyer is using.
Example of the limit. A “form 20” from another state is marked foreign until you find the South Australian equivalent.
Stop and hand it back when
- The draft is about to be filed with unresolved foreign form numbers.
- You are using the tool to invent a South Australian rule number.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-09-22.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Flag procedural steps in a draft that cite a court rule, and list the jurisdiction each citation claims to be from. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- List every procedural citation and its claimed jurisdiction.
- Open the South Australian rule for each one you will keep.
- Delete foreign form numbers that do not exist in this court.
- The lawyer settles the procedure.
Sources
- South Australian courts: generative AI guidelines from 1 January 2026 · 2026-09-22
- Law Society of New South Wales: court protocols on AI, current as at 14 May 2026 · 2026-09-22
Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.