Index supplier forced-labor risk behind an import record
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- List each supplier, the goods named, and whether a detention notice is in the file. Write no conclusion that the presumption is rebutted, and write no public statement.
- What the lawyer must review
- Customs and Border Protection states that it enforces a rebuttable presumption that goods mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, or by an entity on the UFLPA Entity List, are prohibited from importation under 19 U.S.C. section 1307. The tool indexes the file. It does not decide that goods were, or were not, made with forced labor. California supply-chain statute text was not opened, so it is not cited. This is not an Australian modern-slavery statement. Model Rule 1.6 applies to supplier files.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.