Build the supplier risk and remediation record behind the modern slavery statement

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
Assemble the register from questionnaires, audit reports and contract records, and work with the lawyer on the risk rating and the description of each action taken, keeping every entry sourced to the document it came from.
What the lawyer must review
Set the risk criteria, decide each rating, and confirm that what the register says about remediation and effectiveness is supported by what the entity actually did, before any of it is used in a published statement.
Written for / version
US

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceDo not begin AI assistance until the responsible lawyer has defined and confirmed its permitted scope.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Confirm the instructions, the jurisdiction and the complete relevant material before starting.
  2. Set the risk criteria, decide each rating, and confirm that what the register says about remediation and effectiveness is supported by what the entity actually did, before any of it is used in a published statement.
  3. Check the output against the source documents named in it before it is relied on.

Forms and precedents for this task

Forms and precedents for this task
Form or precedentKindAI useSummary
Modern slavery statement template structured to the mandatory criteria (Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) s 16)FormAI use YellowA modern slavery statement template with one section for each mandatory criterion in s 16, the board approval and signing block required by s 13 (or s 14 for a joint statement), and a pre-lodgement checklist for the six-month deadline.

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.

Sources

These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions