Index one person's records for a Victorian specific-causation brief
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Index this person's treatment, wage and product records against questions the lawyer has written. The tool writes no part of the letter and no part of the report. This is one person's causation, not the common questions in the Part 4A proceeding.
- What the lawyer must review
- Write the letter of instruction. The questions are yours.
- Verify the letter yourself. SC GEN 25 calls for particular caution with expert reports.
- Do not use the class data set as this person's history.
- Keep the records in a firm-controlled tool.
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Supreme Court of Victoria, for one group member's causation
Produce. An index against the lawyer's questions, and the letter the lawyer writes.
Have ready. The lawyer's questions; This person's treatment and product records.
Example of the limit. Illustrative example: The common-question report does not deal with this person's surgery date. The lawyer writes a separate letter. The tool indexes only that person's records.
Stop and hand it back when
- The tool adds a causation question.
- Class-wide data is treated as this person's history.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Index this person's treatment, wage and product records against questions the lawyer has written. The tool writes no part of the letter and no part of the report. This is one person's causation, not the common questions in the Part 4A proceeding. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Use only questions the lawyer has written.
- Limit the index to this person's documents.
- The lawyer writes the letter.
- Do not ask the tool to draft or verify the report.
Sources
- Supreme Court of Victoria, Practice Note SC GEN 25 · 2026-10-23
- Supreme Court of Victoria, Practice Note SC Gen 10 · 2026-10-23
If the work reaches the Supreme Court of Victoria, Practice Note SC GEN 25 requires the lawyer to verify output. Do not put health records into a public AI tool. One AI tool cannot verify another.