Index one person's records for a Queensland specific-causation brief
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Index this person's records against questions the lawyer has written. The tool writes no part of the letter and no part of the report. Practice Direction 5 of 2025 is about submissions. It is not an expert-report ban. The lawyer still writes the letter.
- What the lawyer must review
- Write the letter. The questions are yours.
- Limit this to one person's causation, not the common questions in the part 13A proceeding.
- If a submission quotes the report, name the practitioner and verify the references under Practice Direction 5 of 2025.
- Do not cite the District Court generative-AI direction. It was not opened.
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Supreme Court of Queensland, for one group member's causation
Produce. An index against the lawyer's questions, and the letter the lawyer writes.
Have ready. The lawyer's questions; This person's records.
Example of the limit. Illustrative example: The common questions do not ask about this person's batch code. The lawyer writes a separate letter. Any submission that cites the report names the practitioner who checked the citations.
Stop and hand it back when
- The tool drafts the letter.
- Practice Direction 5 of 2025 is treated as forbidding the expert report.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Index this person's records against questions the lawyer has written. The tool writes no part of the letter and no part of the report. Practice Direction 5 of 2025 is about submissions. It is not an expert-report ban. The lawyer still writes the letter. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Use only the lawyer's questions.
- Limit the index to this person's documents.
- Do not describe Practice Direction 5 of 2025 as an expert-report ban.
- Keep the records in a firm-controlled tool.
Sources
- Supreme Court of Queensland, Practice Direction 5 of 2025 · 2026-10-23
- Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld), part 13A practice direction · 2026-10-23
If a submission is filed in the Supreme Court of Queensland, Practice Direction 5 of 2025 requires a named practitioner to verify the references. It is not a general ban on generative AI.