Prepare settlement-approval materials for a New Zealand representative proceeding
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Summarise the proposed settlement and the group definition from the file.
- What the lawyer must review
- Treat it as a representative proceeding under the High Court Rules 2016; there is no s 33V
- Open the current Rules and orders already made
- Treat Law Commission work as reform only
- Written for / version
- New Zealand versionNZCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm that the wording reflects the client’s instructions and contains no unintended admission, concession or commitment. Check the recipient and tone.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.