Review an arbitrator’s AI-use disclosure and list facts for a challenge
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Set the disclosure beside the parties, counsel, and any relationship the file records, and list overlaps and any sentence about how the arbitrator used a tool. Write no challenge.
- What the lawyer must review
- No federal statute opened for this version requires an arbitrator to file a generative-AI disclosure. Formal Opinion 512 addresses a lawyer’s own competence and confidentiality when the lawyer uses a generative tool. It is not an arbitrator code. 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(2) is the vacatur ground of evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, available to the district court where the award was made, after an award. The lawyer decides whether the disclosure raises that ground or a ground in § 10(a)(1), (3), or (4), and the lawyer writes any challenge. A challenge filed in district court is certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b).
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.