Review arbitrator AI-use disclosure and assess a challenge
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Extract the arbitrator's AI disclosure (if any) and the applicable rules/guidance into a comparison table for the lawyer.
- What the lawyer must review
- Decide yourself whether non-disclosure founds a challenge
- Do not send a challenge on a generated analysis
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes extracting and organising information and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.