Verify and disclose generative AI in an Administrative Review Tribunal document
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Extract citations, chronology rows and any translated passages from a draft Tribunal document into a checking list.
- What the lawyer must review
- Remember the lawyer remains responsible for the document
- Do not treat the tool's confirmation of its own output as verification
- Written for / version
- Commonwealth versionCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Administrative Review Tribunal
Produce. A checking list, and a disclosure sentence if the direction requires one.
Have ready. The draft application, submission, statement or chronology; The Tribunal’s generative AI practice direction.
Example of the limit. A chronology prepared with a tool needs a short disclosure naming the tool and who checked it. A statutory declaration must still be the person’s own recollection. The tool must not add to that evidence.
Stop and hand it back when
- A citation has been checked only by asking the tool that produced it.
- The draft adds facts to a witness’s evidence.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-09-22.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Extract citations, chronology rows and any translated passages from a draft Tribunal document into a checking list. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm the proceeding is in the Administrative Review Tribunal and open its generative AI practice direction.
- Verify authorities, evidence references, chronologies and country information in a source that is not the tool which produced them.
- Do not use generative AI to make up, exaggerate, change or add to a person’s evidence.
- If disclosure is required, name the tool, where it was used, and who checked the output.
Sources
Suggested working checks from the linked public source. Read that source before you rely on the check. This is not a record that the check has been done.