Draft judicial-review grounds for the Federal Court or FCFCOA
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Outline candidate grounds with record references. Meet GPN-AI disclosure before filing; keep confidential, privileged or suppressed material out of the tool.
- What the lawyer must review
- Check each authority on AustLII and read the paragraph
- Note invented cases: Valu [2025] FedCFamC2G 94 & 95, JNE24 [2025] FedCFamC2G 1314
- Note also Pasuengos [2025] FedCFamC2G 2129
- Quote verbatim
- Frame grounds under the ADJR Act 1977, s 39B Judiciary Act 1903 or constitutional writs
- Put the GPN-AI (16 April 2026) declaration at the top: tool, function, location
- Written for / version
- Commonwealth versionCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.