Verify and disclose generative AI in a tribunal document
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Extract citations, chronology rows and any translated passages from a draft tribunal document into a checking list.
- What the lawyer must review
- Own the document as the lawyer
- Do not treat the tool's check of its own output as verification
- Confirm the tribunal's current AI practice note before filing
- Written for / version
- Cth
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes extracting and organising information and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.