Outline judicial-review grounds from the decision and the record

Key facts

Human involvement: RedLawyer-led
How AI is used: List the agency action, the statute the decision cites, and the record pages that touch each ground in 5 U.S.C. § 706. Write no paragraph of the petition or the brief.
What the lawyer must review: You plead the case. Under § 706 the reviewing court decides relevant questions of law and shall compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed, and set aside action found to be arbitrary and capricious or otherwise not in accordance with law, contrary to constitutional right, in excess of statutory authority, without procedure required by law, unsupported by substantial evidence in a case under §§ 556 and 557 or another statutory on-the-record hearing, or unwarranted by the facts where the facts are tried de novo. Review is on the whole record, with the rule of prejudicial error. Rule 11 applies to the petition. Finality is § 704, not this section.
Written for / version: United States versionUSCth

Who does what

Who does what
Role	What they do
Assistance	Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes organising research leads. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human.
Lawyer	Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use.

Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.