ACT Courts and ACAT

ACT court AI practice notes

Canberra is not a single jurisdiction. Name the court. ACAT is not the ACT Supreme Court and not the Federal Court. Do not collapse them into one rule.

Effective date

No dedicated Territory note was listed as at 14 May 2026

Commonwealth proceedings heard in Canberra follow the federal note for that court, such as GPN-AI in the Federal Court. Territory matters follow what the ACT Courts have actually published.

No dedicated ACT court AI protocol was listed on the Law Society of New South Wales index as at 14 May 2026

Disclosure checklist

Work through this against the instrument, not instead of it. The checks do not record that the filing is done.

  • Name the court: ACT Supreme Court, Magistrates Court, ACAT, or a federal court sitting in Canberra.
  • For a Federal Court matter, open GPN-AI. For a Territory matter, check the ACT Courts site.
  • Do not apply a state Supreme Court note to an ACT matter.
  • Verify citations and keep personal information out of a public tool.

Sources

Every Australian court page

Each court has its own note. Open the one named on the file.

See suggested levels for this court · All court AI notes · Jurisdiction tasks · Law firm AI policy guide · Practice areas

Questions

Does GPN-AI apply to every case in Canberra?

It applies to Federal Court proceedings. An ACT Supreme Court or ACAT matter follows what that body has published.

Was an ACT note listed in May 2026?

The Law Society of New South Wales index did not list an ACT Supreme Court practice note as at 14 May 2026. Check the Court.

What is the disclosure check?

Use the instrument for the court you named. Do not borrow a state clause.