Court AI practice notes
Information for self-represented litigants regarding the use of Generative AI in litigation
South Australian Employment Tribunal (Tribunal), South Australia.
About this rule
- Issuer
- South Australian Employment Tribunal
- Body type
- Tribunal
- Type
- Information sheet
- Date
- Date not stated
- Confidence
- High
- Jurisdiction
- South Australia
Summary
Information sheet for self-represented litigants, published by SAET alongside the SA courts' Gen AI guidelines, on restrictions on uploading litigation documents and verifying AI-supplied sources.
Points recorded from the source
- Uploading documents received in litigation into open Gen AI may breach the Harman obligation and be contempt of court
- Do not upload suppressed, confidential, privileged or settlement documents unless satisfied the system is closed
- Explains "open" vs "closed" AI systems (e.g. free ChatGPT is open)
- Take reasonable steps to verify that legal sources or references from Gen AI are relevant and accurate
Verify note
Undated; uploaded to SAET site June 2026 (per URL path).
Source
See it in the AI rules tracker by Australian court and bodySouth Australia pageEmployment & Workplace Relations (incl. WHS)