Form · Social Security & Veterans' Entitlements

Application for review of a veterans' entitlements or military compensation decision (Administrative Review Tribunal): guide

Link to the Tribunal's veterans' entitlements page and application, with a guide to which decisions it can review, the earlier review steps (Veterans' Review Board, Repatriation Commission, MRCC), and the information to give.

Kind
Form. A form to complete, or a guide to completing an official one.
Where it applies
Australia, Commonwealth
AI use
Yellow AI can help in set ways. A lawyer checks specific points before use.
Law stated as at
18 October 2026
Status
Maintained. Checked on 18 October 2026 against the official form at art.gov.au and the 4 authorities it cites, for Australia and Commonwealth.
Version
1
Source
Link to the official form. Licence: © Commonwealth of Australia (Administrative Review Tribunal). Link only: use the current form or online application from the Tribunal each time; do not copy or adapt it.

Where this comes from

The official form is published by art.gov.au; this page is a completion guide. Last checked on 2026-10-18.

When to use it

Use when acting for a veteran, member or dependant who disagrees with a decision under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation (Defence-related Claims) Act 1988 or the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the decision letter says the Tribunal can review it.

Used for these tasks

Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.

How AI may be used

AI may check the application and attachments against the Tribunal's list and draft brief reasons from the lawyer's analysis for the lawyer to settle; the lawyer checks every statement in each application and keeps the person's own account in their own words.

AI may

  • Check the application has every item the Tribunal asks for and list what is missing
  • Calculate the lodgment deadline from the date the decision was received, for the lawyer to confirm against the decision letter
  • Draft brief reasons why the decision is wrong from the lawyer's analysis, for the lawyer to settle
  • Index the service, medical and claim records against the conditions in dispute, with sources

AI must not

  • Must not decide whether the decision is reviewable or what the grounds are
  • Must not write the person's statement of their circumstances or evidence in their words
  • Must not process health, disability or income records in a tool not approved for sensitive information

The lawyer checks

  • The decision letter says the Tribunal can review the decision
  • The required earlier review has happened: Veterans' Review Board (most MRCA decisions, and VEA attendant allowance, disability pension and war widow(er)'s pension decisions), Repatriation Commission internal review (most other VEA decisions), or MRCC internal review (most DRCA decisions)
  • Date the decision was received, a copy of the decision, and brief reasons why it is wrong
  • Time limit stated in the decision letter met, or an extension of time sought

Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.

Authorities

Official form

Open the official form. Always use the current version from the issuer. Licence: © Commonwealth of Australia (Administrative Review Tribunal). Link only: use the current form or online application from the Tribunal each time; do not copy or adapt it..

Read the full text

More in Social Security & Veterans' Entitlements

All precedents for Social Security & Veterans' Entitlements · Tasks and AI use in this area