Precedents: Commercial & Corporate Advisory
6 starting-point precedents for this area. Each one names the law it rests on and says how far AI may help.
- Precedents in this area
- 6
- Full text
- For signed-in accounts
- Newest law stated as at
- 17 October 2026
- Guidance for this area
- Tasks and AI use in Commercial & Corporate Advisory
| Precedent | Kind | Where it applies | AI use | Law stated as at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directors' circulating resolution and minutes of directors' meetingLinked templates for an Australian company: a directors' circulating resolution under s 248A and minutes of a directors' meeting, with prompts for interests, quorum, execution and the s 251A minute-book steps. | Other | Australia | Yellow | 17 October 2026 |
| ASIC Form 484: change to company details (officeholders, addresses, members and shares)Completion guide for ASIC Form 484: which changes it reports, the 28-day deadlines and their sources, the evidence to hold before lodging, and the traps that cause late fees or wrong register entries. | Form | Australia | Green | 17 October 2026 |
| Letter of advice to directors on duties and insolvent trading exposureAnswer-first letter advising directors of a company under financial pressure on their statutory duties, insolvent trading liability, the safe harbour and the immediate steps to protect themselves and creditors. | Letter | Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom (England and Wales), United States | Red | 17 October 2026 |
| Mutual confidentiality agreement (Australian law) with AI-tool use restrictionsOriginal Australian-law mutual NDA for commercial discussions. It covers permitted use and disclosure, personal information and data breaches, return or destruction, and when confidential information may be put into AI tools. | Agreement | Australia | Yellow | 17 October 2026 |
| AI use, disclosure, data-training and output-warranty clause for commercial contractsDrop-in clause for services and supply contracts that requires disclosure of AI use, stops customer data being used for model training, sets human review and incident duties, and allocates risk in AI outputs. | Clause | Australia, European Union, United Kingdom (England and Wales) | Yellow | 17 October 2026 |
| Board paper and resolution approving adoption of an AI system (risk, accountability, monitoring)Board paper template, decision resolution and minute extract for approving a material AI system. It covers the business case, legal and privacy risks, accountability, human oversight, monitoring and the questions directors should ask. | Other | Australia, European Union | Yellow | 17 October 2026 |
AI use levels: Green means AI can do most of the drafting and a lawyer reviews it. Yellow means AI helps in set ways and a lawyer checks specific points. Red means a lawyer does the work and AI stays out of the decisive steps.