Compare a privacy-notice draft with the notice-at-collection duties
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Against each item in Civil Code section 1798.100(a), mark whether the draft contains a sentence the lawyer has highlighted, or whether that item is missing. Do not rewrite the notice.
- What the lawyer must review
- Section 1798.100(a) requires the categories, the purposes, whether information is sold or shared, sensitive-information categories where relevant, and the retention period or the criteria, at or before collection. Subsection (c) requires collection to be reasonably necessary and proportionate to the disclosed purpose. The Attorney General's page states the consumer rights a notice has to be able to support. There is no federal APP 1 chapter. You accept or reject every gap the comparison flags before the notice is published. Opinion 512: verify the draft rather than treating a gap list as sign-off.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.