Screen a latent dust enquiry for the statutory path and the damages path

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
In a firm-controlled tool, set the diagnosis, the states of employment and the dust type beside the statutory path and the damages path in the opened instruments, and flag any path those sources do not cover.
What the lawyer must review
  • The lawyer chooses the scheme and the damages forum.
  • Do not treat a dust claim as free of every pre-court step.
  • Confirm the diagnosis against the report, not a conference note.
  • Use a firm-controlled tool. ASCR r 9, APP 11 and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) apply.
Written for / version
NSWVICQLD

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: NSWVICQLD

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceIn a firm-controlled tool, set the diagnosis, the states of employment and the dust type beside the statutory path and the damages path in the opened instruments, and flag any path those sources do not cover.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Check the diagnosis against the report before a path is marked as open.
  2. Check each employment state against a record before a scheme is marked as available.
  3. Confirm the table does not say a dust claim skips every pre-court step.
  4. Confirm any path the opened sources do not cover is marked as not found.

Forms and precedents for this task

Forms and precedents for this task
Form or precedentKindAI useSummary
Dust Diseases Care eligibility checklist for a statutory applicationChecklistAI use YellowChecklist for a Dust Diseases Care eligibility screen: a covered diagnosis, exposure while employed in New South Wales, and a resulting disability.

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.

Sources

These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

The Dust Diseases Tribunal practice-notes index opened on 23 October 2026 has no generative AI note. Do not treat a Supreme Court generative AI note as the Tribunal rule. Do not enter confidential information into a public tool.

Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note SC GEN 25 was issued and commences on 14 May 2026. Do not enter confidential or sensitive information into a public AI tool. Evidence must be in the person's own knowledge and words.

Queensland courts say not to enter private, confidential, suppressed or privileged information into a public generative AI chatbot. For submissions, lawyers follow Supreme Court Practice Direction 5 of 2025 or District Court Practice Direction 12 of 2025. Those directions were not opened beyond the courts page.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions