Prepare a dust-disease chronology for the DDT NSW, ADRF Trust or Comcare asbestos claim
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From employment, exposure and medical records, draft a cited chronology and issues list (disease category, defendants/trusts, limitation flags) under the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW), Workers Compensation (Dust Diseases) Act 1942 (NSW) or ADRF Trust claims.
- What the lawyer must review
- Decide the pathway: statutory (Dust Diseases Care via icare), common law (DDT) or both; each affects the other
- Check the CRP category; malignant disease has a shorter, accelerated timetable
- Do not use the tool to advise on or calculate any Asbestos Claims Resolution Process step for malignant disease
- Confirm the trust (ADRF, BJCT, Hardie, Wunderlich) and its current procedures and eligibility
- Apply DDT limitation provisions, which differ from the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW)
- Check DDT heads of damage, which include some unavailable in workers compensation
- Written for / version
- Australia versionAU
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
- Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
- Verify dates, people and sequence against contemporaneous records. Preserve uncertainty and identify gaps or conflicting accounts.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.