Map a death or dependency claim under the safety-defect statute

Key facts

Human involvement
RedLawyer-led
How AI is used
From the documents the lawyer selects, list the person who died or was injured, each person said to have suffered loss because of the injury or death, and whether the file describes a business or professional relationship with the injured person. Do not write the advice and do not name a state dependency statute.
What the lawyer must review
  • Decide who may claim under s 138(3), s 139 and s 145. The lawyer writes the advice.
  • Do not use section 139 for loss from a business or professional relationship.
  • Do not name a state death or survival section. Those laws are picked up and their sections were not opened.
  • Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool.
Written for / version
NSWVICQLD

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: NSWVICQLD

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceSupporting preparation only. From the documents the lawyer selects, list the person who died or was injured, each person said to have suffered loss because of the injury or death, and whether the file describes a business or professional relationship with the injured person. Do not write the advice and do not name a state dependency statute. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human.
LawyerPerform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use.

Checklist

  1. Keep s 138(3) (the injured person has died) separate from s 139 (a different person suffers loss because of the injury or the death).
  2. Exclude a loss that comes about because of a business or professional relationship between the claimant and the injured person.
  3. Do not name a state fatal-accidents or survival section that has not been opened.
  4. Do not finish the personal-representative discoverability rule in s 87G(6) from an incomplete reading.

Sources

These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions