Draft an applicant-replacement or authorisation-challenge pack
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From the authorisation-meeting notice, attendance roll and minutes, the claim file and the existing applicants' authorisation material, tabulate each authorisation step against its date and source document, index the exhibits to the supporting affidavits, and list the decision-making facts that still have no source. The tool writes no part of the application or the affidavits - no draft, no scaffold, no chronology offered as evidence, no suggested paragraphs - and may only check the pack against the court's form requirements and compare a draft the lawyer wrote with the minutes and the exhibits.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer drafts the application and the supporting affidavits, takes each deponent through their own account of the meeting and swears nothing the deponent has not said, then checks the tabulated steps and the exhibit index against the primary notice and minutes. The lawyer decides which decision-making process the group in fact used, whether the affidavits prove it, and whether the replacement or challenge is properly authorised for the whole claim group.
- Written for / version
- Cth
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes extracting and organising information and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm each factual assertion with the witness and original record. Preserve the witness’s own knowledge and words, and check the court’s rules for this document.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.