Reconcile the antidumping figures on an entry the importer flagged
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Where the entry declares that a reconciliation will be filed, list the entry elements the party identified, the date the intent was declared, the 21-month date, and, if the issue is antidumping or countervailing duty, the date the Customs Service advised that the period of review was completed and the date 90 days after that advice. Set beside those dates the duty measure in 19 U.S.C. 1673. Flag a missing date. Do not compute the duty.
- What the lawyer must review
- 19 U.S.C. 1484(b) is the reconciliation timing rule, including the 90-day rule for antidumping and countervailing duties and the requirement to post bond or other security before filing. The Secretary prescribes regulations for that collection in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce. The amount of an antidumping duty, when the determinations in 19 U.S.C. 1673 are made, is the amount by which normal value exceeds the export price or the constructed export price, in addition to any other duty.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.