Draft winding-up, preference-recovery or stay papers under ss 459A–459P

Key facts

Human involvement
RedLawyer-led
How AI is used
Build the chronology from the demand and the extracts, citing the source document for every entry, and index the exhibits to each affidavit. The tool writes no part of the originating process or of any supporting affidavit — no draft, no scaffold, no suggested paragraphs; on the sworn evidence it may only list facts that still need a source and compare the lawyer’s draft against the cited documents and the court’s form. Meet GPN-AI duties (also NSW SC Gen 23, Qld PD 5 of 2025). Invent no citations.
What the lawyer must review
  • Verify citations on AustLII (Murray v Victoria [2025] FCA 731; Handa & Mallick [2024] FedCFamC2F 957)
  • Under GPN-AI (16 April 2026), confirm facts, authorities and evidence
  • Disclose AI used to prepare evidence at the start of the document
  • Meet SC Gen 23 (from 3 February 2025) and Qld PD 5 of 2025 (24 September 2025) duties
  • Check every dollar figure
Written for / version
Commonwealth versionCth

Rules that apply

The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceSupporting preparation only. Potential support includes extracting and organising information and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human.
LawyerPerform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use.

Checklist

  1. Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
  2. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
  3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
  4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions