Draft winding-up, preference-recovery or stay application papers
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From the demand, the affidavits already sworn and the company extracts, build a dated chronology that cites the source document for every entry, and index the exhibits and annexures to each affidavit. The tool writes no part of the originating process or of any supporting affidavit — no draft, no scaffold, no suggested paragraphs; on the sworn evidence it may only list the facts that still need a source and compare the affidavit the lawyer has written against the demand, the cited documents and the court’s affidavit form.
- What the lawyer must review
- Decide standing, service and current forms yourself
- Verify every exhibit against the file
- Written for / version
- Cth
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes extracting and organising information and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.