Respond to an invitation to comment on adverse information
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the invitation, the application and the client’s records, list each piece of adverse information, its source as stated, the facts and documents that bear on it, and draft the comments for the lawyer to rework.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides how to answer each item, whether more evidence is needed, settles the comments, and confirms they are lodged within the time allowed.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the invitation, the application and the client’s records, list each piece of adverse information, its source as stated, the facts and documents that bear on it, and draft the comments for the lawyer to rework. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the client’s identity documents, immigration history and any protection or family violence information go only into a tool approved for client data, and that the client has consented to AI use as the practice requires.
- Confirm the response period from the invitation.
- Check each item against the client’s own records.
- Confirm the client’s instructions on any concession.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notification of incorrect answer(s) (Home Affairs form 1023) | Form | AI use Yellow | Link to the Home Affairs PDF published as form 1023. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.
Sources
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.