Record the courts page limits, without a leave clause that was not opened
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the forum the lawyer has named, set out the limits on the Queensland Courts generative AI page: the user is responsible for accuracy, and private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not go into a generative AI chatbot. Do not state a leave requirement. Do not draft the report or the instruction letter.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides the forum and what is said to the expert about generative AI.
- State the accuracy duty on the courts page. Do not invent a leave requirement.
- Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool, not a public one.
- ASCR r 9 and APP 11 apply. Decide if a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Queensland. A note of the Queensland Courts generative AI page before a liability expert is instructed.
Produce. A short note of the limits on the courts page, used when the expert is instructed.
Have ready. The forum the lawyer has named; Whether an expert report is to be instructed.
Example of the limit. Illustrative example: The lawyer has named the Supreme Court. The note records the accuracy duty and the confidentiality warning, and records that Practice Direction 5 of 2025 was listed and not opened. It states no leave rule.
Stop and hand it back when
- The tool is asked to state a clause of a practice direction that was not opened.
- The tool is asked to draft the report or the instruction letter.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the forum the lawyer has named, set out the limits on the Queensland Courts generative AI page: the user is responsible for accuracy, and private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not go into a generative AI chatbot. Do not state a leave requirement. Do not draft the report or the instruction letter. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- State that the user is responsible for ensuring that information relied on or provided to the court or tribunal is accurate.
- State that private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not be entered into a generative AI chatbot.
- The page lists Supreme Court Practice Direction 5 of 2025, District Court Practice Direction 12 of 2025, Planning and Environment Court Practice Direction 7 of 2025, and Land Court Practice Direction 4 of 2025. Their text was not opened. Do not state their clauses.
- Do not invent a leave requirement for an expert report. No such clause was opened.
Sources
- Queensland Courts: Using generative AI · 2026-10-23
- Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) section 22 · 2026-10-23
The page also lists subparagraph 16(l) of Supreme Court Practice Direction 14 of 2024, which is about expert evidence in criminal proceedings. That PDF was not opened. It is not a treatment-claim clause.
The Queensland Courts generative AI page says the user is responsible for accuracy of what is given to a court or tribunal, and that private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not go into a generative AI chatbot. Practice Direction 5 of 2025 is listed. Its text was not opened.