Compare the consent form with the notes, against section 22(5)
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the consent form and the notes the lawyer has selected, make a table with one row per risk named in either, recording whether the form names it, whether the notes record a discussion, and the page. Do not decide that a risk was material.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides whether a warning case is open. The table does not decide breach.
- Do not treat section 9A(10) as removing the comparison. The report need not address the failure.
- Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool, not a public one.
- ASCR r 9 and APP 11 apply. Decide if a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Queensland. A consent form compared with the consultation notes.
Produce. A risk table for the section 22(5) question.
Have ready. The consent form; The consultation notes the lawyer selects.
Example of the limit. Illustrative example: The notes record a discussion the form does not name. The table adds that row and records that section 9A(10) does not remove the row.
Stop and hand it back when
- The tool is asked to decide that the warning was adequate.
- The comparison is left entirely to the specialist report.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the consent form and the notes the lawyer has selected, make a table with one row per risk named in either, recording whether the form names it, whether the notes record a discussion, and the page. Do not decide that a risk was material. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- The table has one row for each risk named in the form or the notes, and the row shows the page.
- State section 22(5): section 22 does not apply to liability in connection with giving, or failing to give, a warning, advice or other information in relation to the risk of harm associated with the service.
- If the claim includes a failure to warn, section 9A(10) says the specialist report for part 1 need not comment on that failure. The comparison is still made.
- Do not use the table to answer section 22(1).
Sources
- Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) section 22 · 2026-10-23
- Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld) section 9A · 2026-10-23
- Queensland Courts: Using generative AI · 2026-10-23
The table does not decide that a risk was material or that the warning was adequate.
The Queensland Courts generative AI page says the user is responsible for accuracy of what is given to a court or tribunal, and that private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not go into a generative AI chatbot. Practice Direction 5 of 2025 is listed. Its text was not opened.