Map platform or intermediary liability from the publication path
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the URL, host and complaint history, list who published, who hosted and which complaints-procedure or innocent-dissemination facts are in the file.
- What the lawyer must review
- Confirm the current intermediary statute before you write
- Remember the rules differ by country and are still moving
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital intermediary liability map for an online publication (Defamation Act s 31A) | Checklist | AI use Yellow | Map of every party in an online publication path (author, poster, page owner, platform, search engine, host) against the s 31A digital intermediary defence: accessible complaints mechanism, written complaint and reasonable access prevention steps. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.