Draft the accused's affidavit in a criminal proceeding in the Supreme Court of Western Australia
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Do not substitute the accused's words. List the topics the accused will address.
- What the lawyer must review
- The affidavit stays in the accused's own words. Do not enter suppressed material into a public tool.
- Written for / version
- Written for Western AustraliaUS
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Limit any support to organising, indexing or comparing the source material. The tool writes nothing that goes into the document. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm each factual assertion with the witness and original record. Preserve the witness’s own knowledge and words, and check the court’s rules for this document.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.