Prepare an objection in a Queensland part 13A settlement
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Index the approved scheme against this person's records and list mismatches. Do not write the objection. The objection answers the notice required before a part 13A settlement is decided.
- What the lawyer must review
- Write the objection. It is filed.
- Do not decide a s 103R application without notice unless the court considers it just. That is section 103T(4).
- Match the objection to that notice.
- Name the practitioner on any written submission under Practice Direction 5 of 2025.
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
The work product
Forum. Supreme Court of Queensland, part 13A settlement approval
Produce. The lawyer's objection, with a source index.
Have ready. The settlement notice; The scheme; This person's records.
Example of the limit. Illustrative example: Notice of the s 103R application has been given. The lawyer writes the objection from this person's wage records. The index is not the objection.
Stop and hand it back when
- The tool drafts the objection.
- The settlement is treated as approved because the client wants it.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-23.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Index the approved scheme against this person's records and list mismatches. Do not write the objection. The objection answers the notice required before a part 13A settlement is decided. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm notice was given, or that the court has considered it just to proceed without it.
- Index only this person's records.
- Prefer the Act where the Practice Direction 8 extract is disordered.
- Do not put health records into a public tool.
Sources
- Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld), s 103R and s 103T · 2026-10-23
- Supreme Court of Queensland, Practice Direction 5 of 2025 · 2026-10-23
If a submission is filed in the Supreme Court of Queensland, Practice Direction 5 of 2025 requires a named practitioner to verify the references. It is not a general ban on generative AI.
The tool writes nothing in the filed objection.