Draft the representative plaintiff's affidavit from the proof

Key facts

Human involvement
RedLawyer-led
How AI is used
The tool writes no part of the affidavit — no draft, no paragraph, no heading, no jurat or annexure wording. Before the lawyer drafts, the tool may build a strictly tabular, source-tagged table of the representative's dealings, acquisitions and losses by date, each row set beside the source document it comes from and drawn from the source documents rather than the proofing note or anything the representative said; it is a table of documents, not an outline or a paragraph order for the affidavit. Once the lawyer has drafted, index the exhibits against the lawyer's draft, compare each paragraph against the proofing note and the source documents, and list every assertion with no source. Check the affidavit's form against the court's affidavit rules and the class actions practice note.
What the lawyer must review
The lawyer drafts the affidavit from the proof and the representative swears only their own words, checked back to what the representative actually said, with opinion and submission kept out. Adequacy of representation is a legal issue decided on the evidence and the group definition, not a drafting issue.
Written for / version
US

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceSupporting preparation only. Potential support includes extracting and organising information and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human.
LawyerPerform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use.

Checklist

  1. Confirm each factual assertion with the witness and original record. Preserve the witness’s own knowledge and words, and check the court’s rules for this document.
  2. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
  3. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions