Draft conflict clauses for a class-action funding agreement from the lawyer's list
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Draft clause headings for the conflicts the lawyer names, with the operative words left in square brackets.
- What the lawyer must review
- You write the clauses and you decide what the conflicts are. No rule opened for this task states the terms of a funding agreement or a required conflict procedure. Formal Opinion 512: do not adopt generated operative words you have not written and checked. Model Rule 1.6: do not put the agreement into a public tool. Any disclosure to the court is what the judge's order requires, which you read.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.