Respond to a regulator stop order or proposed stop order on an offer
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From ASIC’s notice, the disclosure document and the due diligence record, list each concern raised beside the passage and the verification for it, and calculate the hearing and response dates. The tool writes nothing in the issuer’s submissions or evidence.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides the response strategy (correct, withdraw or contest), prepares the submissions and any evidence with the directors, and advises the board on the effect of an interim order.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. From ASIC’s notice, the disclosure document and the due diligence record, list each concern raised beside the passage and the verification for it, and calculate the hearing and response dates. The tool writes nothing in the issuer’s submissions or evidence. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm unannounced, price-sensitive deal information goes only into a tool approved for inside information and is handled under the deal’s information barrier.
- Confirm the hearing date and any interim order in force.
- Check each concern against the verification record.
- Confirm no tool wording is in the submissions.
Sources
- Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 739 (ASIC stop orders) · 2026-10-18
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.