Build a verification table for a Securities Act registration statement and prospectus

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
Extract each factual claim in the draft registration statement or prospectus into a table with the source document, the page, and whether the file supports it. Write no sentence of the filing.
What the lawyer must review
Section 5 of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. § 77e) prohibits the sale of an unregistered security and the use of a prospectus that does not meet 15 U.S.C. § 77j. Section 11 (15 U.S.C. § 77k) imposes liability if any part of the registration statement, when that part became effective, contained an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted a material fact required to be stated or necessary to make the statements not misleading. Signers, directors, named experts and underwriters are among those who may be sued. The non-expert due-diligence defence in § 77k(b)(3) requires a reasonable investigation and a reasonable ground to believe the statements were true. You write every sentence that is filed and you open each source. ABA Formal Opinion 512: uncritical reliance on generated output can breach Model Rule 1.1.
Written for / version
United States versionUSCthNZ

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistancePotential support includes extracting and organising information and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
  2. Check the specialist’s assumptions, qualifications and limits. Obtain the relevant expert or specialist review before relying on a technical conclusion.
  3. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
  4. Review the original source set for relevant material absent from the output, including contrary evidence, qualifications and remaining gaps.
  5. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
  6. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions