Respond to a passenger’s claim after a cancelled or delayed flight

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
From the booking, the fare rules, the airline’s or agent’s records of the disruption and the passenger’s claim, build a timeline of the disruption and the offers made, list the remedies the passenger seeks and draft the response from the approved templates.
What the lawyer must review
The lawyer decides whether the consumer guarantees apply and whether the passenger is entitled to a replacement, refund or reimbursement in the circumstances, checks the fare rules do not purport to exclude rights that cannot be excluded, and settles the response.
Written for / version
US

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceFrom the booking, the fare rules, the airline’s or agent’s records of the disruption and the passenger’s claim, build a timeline of the disruption and the offers made, list the remedies the passenger seeks and draft the response from the approved templates.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Check the timeline uses the airline’s operational records, not only the passenger’s account.
  2. Confirm any credit offered is assessed against the consumer guarantee remedies, not instead of them.
  3. Check whether the international carriage regime also applies to the journey.

Forms and precedents for this task

Forms and precedents for this task
Form or precedentKindAI useSummary
Carrier's response to a passenger delay or cancellation claimLetterAI use YellowA letter for an airline answering a passenger's claim after a delay or cancellation, separating Australian Consumer Law guarantees from Montreal Convention delay limits.

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.

Sources

These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions