Track the tribunal appointment deadlines after the notice of arbitration
Key facts
- Human involvement
- GreenLawyer review
- How AI is used
- From the notice of arbitration, its date of receipt, the arbitration agreement and the rules, populate the validated appointment tracker: the number of arbitrators, each party’s appointment deadline, the default appointment trigger and the institution’s role.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer confirms the receipt date, any agreed appointment procedure that displaces the rules, and the client’s nominee, and acts before each deadline.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the notice of arbitration, its date of receipt, the arbitration agreement and the rules, populate the validated appointment tracker: the number of arbitrators, each party’s appointment deadline, the default appointment trigger and the institution’s role. |
| Lawyer | The lawyer confirms the receipt date, any agreed appointment procedure that displaces the rules, and the client’s nominee, and acts before each deadline. |
Checklist
- Confirm the arbitral material may go into the tool under the confidentiality provisions, the rules and any procedural order before it is used.
- Confirm the receipt date of the notice of arbitration from the delivery record.
- Check whether the arbitration agreement varies the appointment procedure.
- Diarise each deadline for two people.
Sources
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.