Analyse recognition or enforcement of an award under the Arbitration Act 1996
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- List the award date, seat, convention relied on, and any article 34 or 36 refusal grounds mentioned in the draft.
- What the lawyer must review
- Apply Arbitration Act 1996 Schedule 1 Chapter 8
- Apply articles 35 and 36 to foreign-seat awards too
- Open the court AI guidelines before any High Court filing
- Do not use an IAA pathway
- Written for / version
- New Zealand versionNZCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.